No. 17
What are the tradeoffs between bread tray height and tray count per pallet in a full truck configuration?
- 7 sections
- 1 table
A taller tray buys product clearance and costs column count, but the cost arrives in steps, not smoothly: a column gains or loses only whole trays, so a height change matters only when it crosses a threshold for the space you load into. What sets that threshold is the stacking pitch, the height each loaded tray adds to a column, which is less than the tray’s overall height because each tray seats into the one below. Two other limits then decide whether extra trays can ride: the load the bottom tray can carry, and the vehicle’s weight limit.
Use stacking pitch, not overall height
Loaded trays seat into each other, so a column’s height is the first tray’s full height plus a smaller increment for each tray above it:
Column height = H + (N − 1) x p
where H is the overall tray height and p is the stacking pitch at the stack level you use. Patented bread trays show why the pitch can differ even for the same tray: in US 5,881,902, trays stacked “in a like orientation” sit with their feet “in a high position,” and trays turned 180° sit “in a low position.” Ask the supplier for the pitch at each level as a number; overall height alone overstates column height.
The threshold effect
Solve the column equation for the number of trays that fit in the usable height U:
N = 1 + whole number part of (U − H) ÷ p
For example, imagine 100 inches of usable height and a 6.1-inch tray:
| Stacking pitch | Trays per column | Column height |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 in | 18 | 96.2 in |
| 5.5 in | 18 | 99.6 in |
| 5.7 in | 17 | 97.3 in |
| 5.9 in | 16 | 94.6 in |
Lowering the pitch from 5.5 to 5.3 inches gains nothing in this space; raising it from 5.5 to 5.9 costs two trays per column. Across, say, 24 column positions in a truck, those two trays are 48 trays per load. A few tenths of an inch of pitch can therefore be free or expensive depending on where it sits against the threshold for your equipment, so run the table with your own usable heights before deciding a tray height is too much.
Usable height is the internal height of the space minus whatever the column stands on (dolly, rack shelf or pallet), minus a margin for loading and any door header. If your fleet has bodies of different heights, run the table for each and decide which body the tray height is optimized for.
Clearance sets the floor; the threshold sets the target
The tray cannot be shorter than its product clearance requires. That minimum comes from the tallest product and closure the tray will carry plus a margin, worked out in our guide to internal clearance height. The decision sequence is:
- Set the minimum clearance from product measurements.
- Translate it into the shortest tray (and pitch) that delivers it.
- Run the threshold table for your truck bodies.
- If the minimum tray falls just above a threshold, look for the clearance margin that could be recovered, and only with measurement data showing the product allows it.
Mixed products complicate step 1: the tallest product sets the height for every tray in a single-height fleet. Whether a second, shorter tray height pays for the sorting it adds depends on the volume share of short products and is a fleet decision, not a tray decision.
Stack load: can the bottom tray carry the extra trays?
A taller column puts more weight on the bottom tray. With N trays in a column, the bottom tray carries the N − 1 loaded trays above it. For example, at 16.1 lb per loaded tray (a 4.10-lb tray plus 12 lb of product), an 18-tray column puts 17 x 16.1 = 273.7 lb on the bottom tray; a 16-tray column puts 241.5 lb on it. The tray’s stack rating has to cover the larger number at the temperature and duration of your longest, warmest leg; how heat affects that is covered in our guide to temperature and tray integrity. A column that fits the space but exceeds the rating is not a gain.
Weight versus space: which limit binds
Bread is light for its volume, so a truck of loaded trays can fill its space before its weight capacity, but dense products and heavy packaging can reverse that. Check both:
- Space: columns per truck x trays per column.
- Weight: that number x loaded tray weight, plus the weight of dollies, racks or pallets, against the vehicle’s legal and rated payload.
If weight binds, extra trays per column cannot ride, and a lighter tray or lighter product per tray is worth more than a shorter tray.
Pallets, dollies and racks
The same arithmetic applies to whatever the column stands on, but the footprint changes the floor count. For example, a tray with a 26.9 x 22.0 inch footprint fits a 48 x 40 inch pallet (the North American GMA size described in the encyclopedia entry on pallets) two columns per pallet, with the 22.0-inch sides along the 48-inch edge; turned the other way it fits only one. Bakery route trucks also carry trays on rails or on dollies rather than pallets, which changes both usable height and positions per truck, so run the numbers for the system you use. Route rails are described in US 4,519,503, where trays are “loaded onto rails of appropriate route delivery trucks.”
Racking and storage
If loaded columns are stored in racks before shipping, the column height also has to clear the rack beam above with handling room. A column that fits the truck but not the rack opening forces a different column height in the warehouse, so include the rack opening among the usable heights in the threshold table. How workflows with warehouse storage differ from direct loading is covered in our guide to oven-to-truck and warehouse workflows.
Decide tray height with the threshold table, the stack rating and the weight check side by side; any one of them alone can point to the wrong tray.